Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctrine of scrivener's error

Read a random definition: Hadley v. Baxendale rule

A quick definition of doctrine of scrivener's error:

The Doctrine of Scrivener's Error is a rule that allows a mistake in a written document to be corrected if there is clear and convincing evidence of a typographical error. This means that if there is a mistake in a document that was not intended, it can be fixed as long as there is proof that it was a mistake. This rule only applies to minor errors, like spelling mistakes or typos, and not to major mistakes like changing the meaning of a contract.

A more thorough explanation:

The Doctrine of Scrivener's Error is a rule that allows a typographical error in a legal document to be corrected by parol evidence if the evidence is precise, clear, and convincing. This means that if there is a mistake in a legal document, it can be fixed if there is enough evidence to prove that it was a simple error and not intentional.

For example, if a contract mistakenly states that the price of a product is $100 instead of $200, the Doctrine of Scrivener's Error can be used to correct the mistake if there is evidence that it was a simple typo and not intentional.

Another example is if a court order mistakenly states the wrong date for a hearing, the Doctrine of Scrivener's Error can be used to correct the mistake if there is evidence that it was a simple error and not intentional.

The Doctrine of Scrivener's Error is important because it allows for mistakes to be corrected without having to go through the process of creating a new legal document or going to court to fix the mistake.

doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions | doctrine of separate spheres

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.