Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctrine of separate spheres

Read a random definition: scope note

A quick definition of doctrine of separate spheres:

The doctrine of separate spheres is an old idea that says husbands and wives have different roles in the family. According to this idea, wives are supposed to take care of the home and family, while husbands are supposed to work and provide for the family. This idea was popular in the 19th century, but it is not widely accepted today.

A more thorough explanation:

The doctrine of separate spheres is a historical belief that wives were limited to controlling the home, or the personal and domestic sphere, while husbands had control of the public sphere. This belief was common in family law during the early 19th century.

Under this doctrine, wives were expected to take care of the home and family, while husbands were expected to be the breadwinners. This meant that wives were not allowed to participate in public life, such as voting or holding political office.

For example, a woman who wanted to become a lawyer or doctor would not have been allowed to do so under the doctrine of separate spheres. Instead, she would have been expected to stay at home and take care of her family.

Another example is that women were not allowed to own property in their own name. Instead, all property was owned by the husband, who had complete control over it.

These examples illustrate how the doctrine of separate spheres limited the opportunities available to women and reinforced traditional gender roles. It was not until the women's rights movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries that these beliefs began to be challenged and changed.

doctrine of scrivener's error | doctrine of specialty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
which to be clear I really like Kent
it has a gym which is very exciting for me
Mostlylegal
11:41
i would see if you could reneg uiuc, they are an up and coming school
I am going to Loyola and Kents admitted student weekend Friday and Saturday back to back
I tried to renegotiate UIUC they denied me
also did not have the best experience at my visit there and went there for undergrad
so a new environment will be nice :)
Mostlylegal
11:43
well thats good since itll make the decision easier
yes I withdrew from uiuc hoping someone else will be able to take my spot who is willing to pay that much lol
Mostlylegal
11:43
thats kind of you
hit message limit: we can all be chi big law friends HAHAH also i'm sorry about uiuc!!
best of luck everyone ❤️
is BC releasing an A's today
It's been over 3 months since my GULC interview and still nothing. This is agony they are my top choice, but I am nit hopeful lol
Mostlylegal
12:07
rip
Mostlylegal
12:07
are you at medians?
I'm above the 75th for GPA and at the median for LSAT
I figured they must've just hated me so bad, but why not just reject me sooner lol
Mostlylegal
12:19
maybe they are just scrounging up enough funds for your full ride :)
omfg penn state law scared tf out of me with that email
Emory A wave
"update on decision....timeline!" STOP DOING THAT
RT
just say it on LSAC bruh
"decision rendered"
vomit inducing email like oh my lord i thought i was gonna die
12:27
Did someone say chicago big law friends? I am in
hello chi big law friend
i work midsize law rn in chi
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:50
@MisterSaint: WashU called me with my A six days post-interview (interviewed last Tues). I think timelines are a bit extended rn since it's crunch time in admissions offices
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.