Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority

Read a random definition: vice-admiralty court

A quick definition of Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority:

Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority is a law that helps to quickly and efficiently close down big, complicated financial companies that are close to failing. This law is an alternative to bankruptcy and is meant to protect the American economy by making sure that shareholders and creditors bear the losses of the failed company, removing the management responsible for the company's financial condition, and ensuring that claimants are paid at least as much as they would have received under bankruptcy. The law also creates a priority list for paying claims, with executives and shareholders being paid last. The law bans the use of taxpayer funds to preserve a company that has been put into receivership under Title II, which means that failing financial institutions will have no choice but to liquidate. Large financial companies must create plans for a quick and orderly wind-up in case of financial distress or failure.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Title II, also known as the Orderly Liquidation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, is a process that allows for the quick and efficient liquidation of a large, complex financial company that is close to failing. It provides an alternative to bankruptcy, where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is appointed as a receiver to carry out the liquidation and wind-up of the company. The FDIC is given certain powers as a receiver and a three to five-year timeframe to finish the liquidation process. The purpose of Title II is to protect the financial stability of the American economy, force shareholders and creditors to bear the losses of the failed financial company, remove management that was responsible for the financial condition of the company, and ensure that payout to claimants is at least as much as the claimants would have received under a bankruptcy liquidation.

Example: In 2008, many large financial institutions were in dire financial straits, and the government attempted to preserve some of these institutions with over $1.7 trillion in bailouts. Despite the bailouts, over 250 banks failed in the period from 2008 to 2010, and Lehman Brothers, the fourth-largest investment bank in the United States, filed for bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 bankruptcy in U.S. history. In light of the failure of these “too big to fail” institutions, Congress saw the need for a government authority to provide for efficient liquidation of large, complex financial institutions, and to eliminate the potential of future government bailouts.

Explanation: The example illustrates the need for Title II, which was created to prevent future government bailouts for struggling financial institutions. The failure of large financial institutions in 2008 showed that the government needed a process to quickly and efficiently liquidate a large, complex financial company that is close to failing. Title II provides an alternative to bankruptcy and aims to protect the financial stability of the American economy.

Example: Title II provides a claims process to assert claims against a defaulting financial company, and a series of rules to allow for liquidation of assets and the payment of claim holders according to a list of priority payments. Claims are paid in the following order: (1) administrative costs; (2) the government; (3) wages, salaries, or commissions of employees; (4) contributions to employee benefit plans; (5) any other general or senior liability of the company; (6) any junior obligation; (7) salaries of executives and directors of the company; and (8) obligations to shareholders, members, general partners, and other equity holders.

Explanation: The example illustrates the claims process under Title II, which is modeled like the bankruptcy code claims process but has some differences that impact how Title II liquidation will operate. The priority list helps advance the goal of ensuring that the executives, directors, and shareholders bear the losses of the failed company by being last in line to receive payment. Title II includes other provisions to hold executives liable, including the executive clawback provision, which allows the FDIC to recover incentive payment and other compensation made to executives from up to two years prior to the company’s failure.

Dodd-Frank: Title I - Financial Stability | Dodd-Frank: Title III - Transfer of Powers to the Comptroller of the Currency, the Corporation, and the Board of Governors

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.