Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority

Read a random definition: presentment of Englishry

A quick definition of Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority:

Dodd-Frank: Title II - Orderly Liquidation Authority is a law that helps to quickly and efficiently close down big, complicated financial companies that are close to failing. This law is an alternative to bankruptcy and is meant to protect the American economy by making sure that shareholders and creditors bear the losses of the failed company, removing the management responsible for the company's financial condition, and ensuring that claimants are paid at least as much as they would have received under bankruptcy. The law also creates a priority list for paying claims, with executives and shareholders being paid last. The law bans the use of taxpayer funds to preserve a company that has been put into receivership under Title II, which means that failing financial institutions will have no choice but to liquidate. Large financial companies must create plans for a quick and orderly wind-up in case of financial distress or failure.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Title II, also known as the Orderly Liquidation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, is a process that allows for the quick and efficient liquidation of a large, complex financial company that is close to failing. It provides an alternative to bankruptcy, where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is appointed as a receiver to carry out the liquidation and wind-up of the company. The FDIC is given certain powers as a receiver and a three to five-year timeframe to finish the liquidation process. The purpose of Title II is to protect the financial stability of the American economy, force shareholders and creditors to bear the losses of the failed financial company, remove management that was responsible for the financial condition of the company, and ensure that payout to claimants is at least as much as the claimants would have received under a bankruptcy liquidation.

Example: In 2008, many large financial institutions were in dire financial straits, and the government attempted to preserve some of these institutions with over $1.7 trillion in bailouts. Despite the bailouts, over 250 banks failed in the period from 2008 to 2010, and Lehman Brothers, the fourth-largest investment bank in the United States, filed for bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 bankruptcy in U.S. history. In light of the failure of these “too big to fail” institutions, Congress saw the need for a government authority to provide for efficient liquidation of large, complex financial institutions, and to eliminate the potential of future government bailouts.

Explanation: The example illustrates the need for Title II, which was created to prevent future government bailouts for struggling financial institutions. The failure of large financial institutions in 2008 showed that the government needed a process to quickly and efficiently liquidate a large, complex financial company that is close to failing. Title II provides an alternative to bankruptcy and aims to protect the financial stability of the American economy.

Example: Title II provides a claims process to assert claims against a defaulting financial company, and a series of rules to allow for liquidation of assets and the payment of claim holders according to a list of priority payments. Claims are paid in the following order: (1) administrative costs; (2) the government; (3) wages, salaries, or commissions of employees; (4) contributions to employee benefit plans; (5) any other general or senior liability of the company; (6) any junior obligation; (7) salaries of executives and directors of the company; and (8) obligations to shareholders, members, general partners, and other equity holders.

Explanation: The example illustrates the claims process under Title II, which is modeled like the bankruptcy code claims process but has some differences that impact how Title II liquidation will operate. The priority list helps advance the goal of ensuring that the executives, directors, and shareholders bear the losses of the failed company by being last in line to receive payment. Title II includes other provisions to hold executives liable, including the executive clawback provision, which allows the FDIC to recover incentive payment and other compensation made to executives from up to two years prior to the company’s failure.

Dodd-Frank: Title I - Financial Stability | Dodd-Frank: Title III - Transfer of Powers to the Comptroller of the Currency, the Corporation, and the Board of Governors

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
Very few of any,, none come to my mind tbh
17:19
@llama: hi
They all seem like mental health and access to gun issues
Not mental health regarding gender and usually it’s a gun kids get right in the house
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.