Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doubling

Read a random definition: practice court

A quick definition of doubling:

Term: Doubling

Definition: Doubling is when a married couple can protect twice as much property in bankruptcy than if they filed separately. This means that if they own something together, like a car, they can each protect the full value of it. This helps them keep more of their things in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy or pay less to creditors in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

A more thorough explanation:

Doubling is a term used in bankruptcy law that refers to the right of a married couple to claim twice the amount of an exemption when they file a joint case.

According to the law, each debtor in a joint case can claim exemptions separately. For example, if a couple jointly owns a car worth $10,000, each spouse can claim an exemption of $10,000, depending on the state's exemption laws.

Doubling is beneficial for married couples in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. In Chapter 7, it allows the couple to keep more of their property, while in Chapter 13, it enables them to pay less to unsecured creditors.

For instance, if a couple files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and has a joint bank account with $20,000, they can claim a total exemption of $20,000 or $10,000 each. This means that they can keep the entire amount in their account without having to pay it to their creditors.

In summary, doubling is a legal provision that allows married couples to claim twice the amount of an exemption in bankruptcy cases, which can help them keep more of their property or pay less to their creditors.

double-entry accounting | dower

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.