Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

driving under the influence (DUI)

Read a random definition: Corpus Juris Civilis

A quick definition of driving under the influence (DUI):

Driving under the influence (DUI) is when someone drives a car while they are drunk or high on drugs. It is against the law in all states and can be very dangerous. Police officers can test a driver's breath, blood, or urine if they think the driver is impaired. If a driver refuses to take the test, they may lose their driver's license. DUI charges usually refer to cases of alcohol impairment, while DWI charges usually refer to cases of impairment by recreational or prescribed drugs. The legal limit for blood-alcohol content (BAC) is 0.08%, but some states may enforce a lower limit. It is important to never drink and drive or use drugs and drive, as it can cause accidents and harm to yourself and others.

A more thorough explanation:

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a criminal offense that occurs when a person operates a vehicle while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or other controlled substances. This impairment can cause dangerous driving and put others on the road at risk.

In some states, DUI and driving while intoxicated/impaired (DWI) are used interchangeably. However, in states that charge both offenses, DUI usually refers to cases of alcohol impairment, while DWI usually refers to cases of impairment by recreational or prescribed drugs.

Law enforcement officers can ask drivers to undergo chemical testing of their breath, blood, or urine whenever the officer suspects the driver of impairment. This suspicion is usually triggered when an officer witnesses dangerous or erratic driving. Drivers can refuse chemical testing, but in most jurisdictions, such a refusal will result in an automatic forfeiture of driving licensure.

Testing and arrests for DUI and DWI can also occur at sobriety checkpoints set up by the police. The Supreme Court upheld sobriety checkpoint programs as constitutional in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, holding that 4th Amendment concerns over seizure were outweighed by the degree to which the sobriety checkpoint advanced the public interest in road safety.

Most impaired driving offenses are charged after a breathalyzer or blood test indicates that a driver’s blood-alcohol content (BAC) is above the federal BAC limit of 0.08%. State law may enforce a lower legal BAC limit. Some states may pursue DUI/DWI charges at lower levels for drivers under the legal drinking age. Some states may also allow charges to be brought without chemical testing results, if there is a suspicion of impairment due to erratic or dangerous driving coupled with a failed field sobriety test.

  • John was pulled over by a police officer for swerving on the road. The officer suspected that John was driving under the influence and asked him to take a breathalyzer test. John refused, and as a result, his driver's license was automatically forfeited.
  • Samantha was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint and was asked to take a breathalyzer test. The test showed that her BAC was above the legal limit, and she was arrested for DUI.
  • Mike was driving home from a party and was pulled over for speeding. The officer noticed that Mike's eyes were bloodshot and that he was slurring his words. The officer asked Mike to take a field sobriety test, which he failed. As a result, Mike was charged with DUI even though he refused to take a chemical test.

These examples illustrate how DUI charges can be brought against drivers who are suspected of impairment due to alcohol or drugs. In each case, the driver exhibited signs of impairment, and law enforcement officers took action to ensure the safety of others on the road.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) | driving while black

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Personal stuff with my ex :/. I wanted to vent to strangers on the internet lol
How’s Cornell? 4th week this week?
that sucks :(
yeah were just ending the 4th week
lots of work, but manageable
It does. Really bad, I think my boss new I was crying in my car lolllll
sorry that sucks
That’s good! You got a good routine going?
It’s ok, we ball
we ball
Yesirrrr
yeah, try to get most of the readings done on the weekends so the weeks arent as bad
hurting for free time though
Quillinit
11:52
wasp i just looked at your cycle and did you like pee in the shoes of admissions officers?
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.