Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

driving under the influence (DUI)

Read a random definition: patent defect

A quick definition of driving under the influence (DUI):

Driving under the influence (DUI) is when someone drives a car while they are drunk or high on drugs. It is against the law in all states and can be very dangerous. Police officers can test a driver's breath, blood, or urine if they think the driver is impaired. If a driver refuses to take the test, they may lose their driver's license. DUI charges usually refer to cases of alcohol impairment, while DWI charges usually refer to cases of impairment by recreational or prescribed drugs. The legal limit for blood-alcohol content (BAC) is 0.08%, but some states may enforce a lower limit. It is important to never drink and drive or use drugs and drive, as it can cause accidents and harm to yourself and others.

A more thorough explanation:

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a criminal offense that occurs when a person operates a vehicle while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or other controlled substances. This impairment can cause dangerous driving and put others on the road at risk.

In some states, DUI and driving while intoxicated/impaired (DWI) are used interchangeably. However, in states that charge both offenses, DUI usually refers to cases of alcohol impairment, while DWI usually refers to cases of impairment by recreational or prescribed drugs.

Law enforcement officers can ask drivers to undergo chemical testing of their breath, blood, or urine whenever the officer suspects the driver of impairment. This suspicion is usually triggered when an officer witnesses dangerous or erratic driving. Drivers can refuse chemical testing, but in most jurisdictions, such a refusal will result in an automatic forfeiture of driving licensure.

Testing and arrests for DUI and DWI can also occur at sobriety checkpoints set up by the police. The Supreme Court upheld sobriety checkpoint programs as constitutional in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, holding that 4th Amendment concerns over seizure were outweighed by the degree to which the sobriety checkpoint advanced the public interest in road safety.

Most impaired driving offenses are charged after a breathalyzer or blood test indicates that a driver’s blood-alcohol content (BAC) is above the federal BAC limit of 0.08%. State law may enforce a lower legal BAC limit. Some states may pursue DUI/DWI charges at lower levels for drivers under the legal drinking age. Some states may also allow charges to be brought without chemical testing results, if there is a suspicion of impairment due to erratic or dangerous driving coupled with a failed field sobriety test.

  • John was pulled over by a police officer for swerving on the road. The officer suspected that John was driving under the influence and asked him to take a breathalyzer test. John refused, and as a result, his driver's license was automatically forfeited.
  • Samantha was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint and was asked to take a breathalyzer test. The test showed that her BAC was above the legal limit, and she was arrested for DUI.
  • Mike was driving home from a party and was pulled over for speeding. The officer noticed that Mike's eyes were bloodshot and that he was slurring his words. The officer asked Mike to take a field sobriety test, which he failed. As a result, Mike was charged with DUI even though he refused to take a chemical test.

These examples illustrate how DUI charges can be brought against drivers who are suspected of impairment due to alcohol or drugs. In each case, the driver exhibited signs of impairment, and law enforcement officers took action to ensure the safety of others on the road.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) | driving while black

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.