Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

emergency doctrine

Read a random definition: apertura testamenti

A quick definition of emergency doctrine:

The emergency doctrine is a legal principle that says if someone is in a dangerous situation and doesn't have time to think, they can't be blamed for not being careful. If they didn't cause the emergency and did what they could to be safe, they won't be considered careless. The court will decide if the situation was an emergency and if the person's actions were reasonable.

A more thorough explanation:

The emergency doctrine is a legal principle that excuses a person from the usual standard of reasonable care if they are faced with an emergency situation that leaves little or no time for thought, deliberation, or consideration. This means that if someone is in an emergency situation, they may not be held responsible for any harm caused if they acted reasonably and prudently in that situation.

Here are some examples of how the emergency doctrine might apply:

  • If a driver suddenly swerves into your lane and you have to quickly swerve to avoid a collision, you may not be held responsible for any damage caused to other vehicles or property if your actions were reasonable and prudent in the emergency context.
  • If a person is choking and you perform the Heimlich maneuver to save their life, you may not be held responsible for any injuries caused if you acted reasonably and prudently in the emergency context.

These examples illustrate how the emergency doctrine can apply in different situations. In both cases, the person was faced with an emergency situation that required quick action. If their actions were reasonable and prudent in that situation, they may not be held responsible for any harm caused.

emergency | emergency powers

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.