Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

search warrant

Read a random definition: arbitrary trademark

A quick definition of search warrant:

A search warrant is a special paper signed by a judge that allows police officers to search a person, a place, or a car for evidence of a crime. This paper is important because it protects people's privacy from being invaded by the government without a good reason. To get a search warrant, the police officer must have a good reason to believe that they will find evidence of a crime in the place they want to search. The warrant must also say exactly where they can search and what they can look for. If the police find evidence that was not listed on the warrant, they cannot use it in court. There are some exceptions to the rule that police need a warrant to search, like if they see something illegal in plain sight or if they think someone is in danger.

A more thorough explanation:

A search warrant is a legal document signed by a judge or magistrate that allows law enforcement officers to search a specific person, place, or vehicle for evidence of a crime. The warrant is required to protect individuals' privacy rights against unreasonable government intrusion, as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

For a search warrant to be valid, it must meet certain requirements:

  • Probable cause: The officer must have reasonable information to support the possibility that evidence of a crime will be found.
  • Particularity: The warrant must describe the place to be searched with specificity.
  • Signed by a neutral and detached magistrate or judge: The warrant must be signed by an impartial judge or magistrate.

When executing a search warrant, officers must follow certain rules:

  • Object: The warrant must be executed by government officers, not private citizens.
  • Timing: The warrant must be executed in a timely manner to prevent the loss of probable cause.
  • Manner: Officers must follow the knock-and-announce rule, which requires them to announce their authority and purpose before entering a premises and wait a reasonable amount of time before using force to enter.
  • Extent: Officers may only search the places and individuals listed on the warrant.

There are certain exceptions to the warrant requirement:

Example 1: A police officer obtains a search warrant to search a suspect's home for drugs. The warrant is signed by a judge and describes the specific areas of the home that may be searched. The officer executes the warrant and finds drugs in the suspect's bedroom. The evidence is admissible in court because the search was conducted with a valid warrant.

Example 2: An officer pulls over a car for a traffic violation and sees a gun on the passenger seat. The officer seizes the gun without a warrant because it was in plain view and the officer had a lawful reason to be on the premises.

Example 3: A fire department enters a home to put out a fire and sees drugs on the kitchen counter. The fire department calls the police, who seize the drugs without a warrant because the exigent circumstances of the fire allowed for immediate action to secure the premises.

These examples illustrate how search warrants are used to protect individuals' privacy rights while allowing law enforcement to gather evidence of criminal activity.

search and seizure | Seasonable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
14:54
What do people typically write in the 'Optional Statement' for Georgetown
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.