Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

enemy combatant

Read a random definition: absque ipsius regis speciali licentia

A quick definition of enemy combatant:

An enemy combatant is a person who fights against another country or group during a war. The term was used by the US government to describe people suspected of supporting or participating in terrorist activities against the United States. These people were detained without charge and held indefinitely in places like Guantanamo Bay. The US Supreme Court later ruled that these detainees have the right to challenge their imprisonment in court. In 2009, the Obama administration stopped using the term "enemy combatant" but the detainees remained in prison without charge.

A more thorough explanation:

An enemy combatant is a person who fights against the United States during a time of war or conflict. This term was created by President George W. Bush's administration to describe people suspected of supporting or participating in terrorist activities against the United States.

Enemy combatants are detained by the U.S. military without charge and for an indefinite amount of time. They are not given the same rights and protections as prisoners of war under the Third Geneva Convention of 1949. The U.S. military has used this term to detain members of Al-Qaida and Taliban fighters.

For example, after the 9/11 attacks, many suspected terrorists were detained as enemy combatants and sent to Guantanamo Bay prison. They were held there without charge and subject to interrogation techniques that were considered torture.

The status of enemy combatants has been controversial because it raises questions about whether they are entitled to the same protections as prisoners of war and whether they have the right to challenge their imprisonment in U.S. courts. In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that enemy combatants have the right to challenge their imprisonment through habeas corpus petitions filed in U.S. courts. In 2008, the Supreme Court confirmed this right in Boumediene v. Bush.

In 2009, the Obama administration ruled that detainees in Guantanamo would no longer be designated as enemy combatants. However, they would still be held indefinitely without charge.

endowment insurance | energy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.