Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

extinguishment of legacy

Read a random definition: Plant Variety Protection Act

A quick definition of extinguishment of legacy:

Extinguishment of legacy is when a gift that was supposed to be given to someone in a will cannot be given anymore because the thing that was supposed to be given is not there anymore or the person who was supposed to get it already received something else instead. There are two ways this can happen: either the thing that was supposed to be given doesn't exist anymore, or the person who was supposed to get it already got something else instead.

A more thorough explanation:

Extinguishment of legacy is also known as ademption. It refers to the situation where a gift made in a will cannot be given to the beneficiary because it no longer exists or is no longer part of the estate at the time of the testator's death. There are two theories of ademption: the identity theory and the intent theory.

The identity theory of ademption means that if a specific piece of property is not part of the testator's estate upon their death, then the gift will fail. For example, if a testator leaves a specific painting to their niece, but the painting is sold before the testator's death, then the niece will not receive the painting.

The intent theory of ademption means that if a specific devise is no longer in the testator's estate at the time of their death, the beneficiary will receive a gift of equal value if it can be proved that the testator did not intend the gift to be adeemed. For example, if a testator leaves a specific piece of property to their niece, but they sell the property and use the proceeds to buy a different property, the niece may still receive a gift of equal value if it can be shown that the testator intended for them to receive something of equal value.

There are two types of ademption: ademption by extinction and ademption by satisfaction. Ademption by extinction occurs when the unique property that is the subject of a specific bequest has been sold, given away, or destroyed, or is not otherwise in existence at the time of the testator's death. Ademption by satisfaction occurs when the testator, while alive, has already given property to the beneficiary in lieu of the testamentary gift.

For example, if a testator leaves a specific car to their nephew, but the car is destroyed in an accident before the testator's death, then the nephew will not receive the car. This is an example of ademption by extinction. On the other hand, if a testator leaves a specific car to their nephew, but they give the nephew a different car while they are still alive, then the nephew may not receive the specific car mentioned in the will. This is an example of ademption by satisfaction.

extinguishment of copyhold | extinguishment of lien

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:17
@Law-Guy: you get it
16:19
@baddestbunny: oh yeah definitly. Idk how any system of government would work if you can't distribute social goods to everyone.
MildChiller
16:33
does anyone know if the Yale webinars are cameras on?
1a2b3c4d26z
16:35
Justice as deez!
17:49
Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
Just found out LSAC gpa is different from offical from undergrad, went from 3.0 on 4.0 scale to 2.67... Guess I'm a super splitter rather than a splitter
just submitted my first ever app! and now I am consumed by The Dread
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.