Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

extrajudicial admission

Read a random definition: de audiendo et terminando

A quick definition of extrajudicial admission:

An extrajudicial admission is when someone says something outside of court that can be used against them in court. It's like admitting to something bad you did. There are different types of admissions, like when someone stays silent instead of denying something, or when someone approves of what someone else said. Lawyers also have to go through a process called admission to become a member of the practicing bar. In patents, an admission is when someone says that something else is already known or has been done before.

A more thorough explanation:

An extrajudicial admission is a statement made outside of court proceedings that is offered as evidence against the person who made the statement. It is an acknowledgment of facts that are true and can be harmful to the person's position as a litigant.

For example, if a person is accused of stealing and they admit to the theft during a conversation with a friend, that admission can be used as evidence against them in court. This is an extrajudicial admission because it was made outside of court proceedings.

Extrajudicial admissions can also include admissions by an employee or agent of a party, as well as admissions by silence or failure to speak after another party's assertion of fact.

Overall, extrajudicial admissions are important in legal proceedings because they can provide valuable evidence that can be used to prove a case against a party.

extrahazardous | extrajudicial confession

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.