Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

false return

Read a random definition: contra non valentem

A quick definition of false return:

A false return is when someone, like a court official or process server, lies and says they did something they didn't actually do. For example, they might say they served legal papers when they didn't. This is not allowed and can have serious consequences. Return can also mean bringing something back to a court or reporting what was done with it, like a report of voting results or the profit made on an investment after expenses are taken out.

A more thorough explanation:

A false return is when a court official or process server lies about serving legal documents or taking some other action. It can also refer to an official report that contains incorrect information.

  • A process server claims to have served legal papers to someone, but in reality, they did not.
  • A court official reports that they have taken action on a case, but they have not actually done anything.
  • An election official reports incorrect voting results.

These examples illustrate how a false return can occur when someone intentionally provides false information in an official report or document.

false representation | false statement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:08
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: baby is out?! Congratulations Bulb&Bulbs wifey!!
Dkk
19:22
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: Oh, I missed that. Nice and congrats!
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
19:34
Yes she is, thank you everyone. She is a perfect little baby bulbasaur. Just waiting to get her all that law school swag so she can flex on other babies.
jackfrost11770
20:00
CONGRATSSSS
glove
20:56
My dick fell off
21:00
@glove: feelsbadman.exe
windyMagician
21:21
let me hold it for you
21:40
^Typical UMich student, always offering a hand to those in need
21:45
hey y’all if i applied on dec 12 (yes ik i applied a little late), to st. john’s, hofstra, nyls, brooklyn, cardozo, i miami - when do you think i’ll start to hear back. i have 164 and 3.91
21:46
i would be hard pressed if you did not hear back from most by feb1, imho
thatsmyline
21:49
let the jan decisions bloodbath commence
@getmoney: mid feb to march. april for the stragglers
22:13
awwww bulb is a dad now
HeadyInvincibleRabbit
22:14
does anyone know what the hopes are for those that are deferred? i got deferred from nyu ed with pretty low stats so i'm confused as to whether I should be hopeful or upset
22:21
youll probably be waitlisted then bc they dont usually waitlist ED on the spot
22:21
you could be hopeful and waitlist is something to be hopeful about
HeadyInvincibleRabbit
22:22
yea i'm trying to stay positively bc both my lsat and gpa were below the q25 but still somehow didn't get straight up rejected
22:42
i also dont think its rare to get deferred, a lot of ppl got deferred this cycle from what i heard simply bc nyu didnt make it to their application by the ED deadline
Dkk
0:19
@getmoney: psshh could be this week.
Dkk
0:20
Welcome to the night shift of the REAL cycle.
1:06
ive fallen in love w 2 law schools thus far this application cycle - northwestern and michigan
1:06
like as i was researching for the why x essays i rly loved these
1:06
i wanna go to the midwest but i also wanna be somewhere progressive hmmm
1:06
maybe ill just stay in la i love it here
Dkk
1:10
I wanna be at Scalia law.
Dkk
1:11
I would consider Michigan but not northwestern
1:16
why
1:16
what about uchicago too
Dkk
1:51
U chicago yeah but Northwestern seems like a mess given that whole scandal thing.
Dkk
1:52
The whole no white guys hiring thing. Not for me cus I am a white guy!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.