Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

family court

Read a random definition: ambiguity

A quick definition of family court:

Family court is a special court that deals with problems that happen in families. This court only handles certain kinds of problems, like when parents get divorced, when they fight over who gets to take care of their children, or when someone in the family is being hurt or abused. Each state and city has its own rules for how family court works. Sometimes, family court also helps decide who should take care of someone who can't take care of themselves, like an older person or a child with special needs.

A more thorough explanation:

Family court, also known as domestic court, is a type of court that deals with cases related to family law. This court has limited jurisdiction and only hears cases that involve family law matters. Examples of cases that are heard in family court include:

Family court is governed by state and local law, which means that the procedures and rules can vary depending on the jurisdiction. For instance, some jurisdictions may have family courts that handle guardianship and incompetence hearings, while others may leave these matters to probate courts.

The examples given illustrate how family court deals with cases that involve family law matters. For instance, if a couple decides to get a divorce, they would need to go to family court to settle issues related to property division, child custody, and spousal support. Similarly, if a child is being abused by a family member, the case would be heard in family court to determine the best course of action to protect the child.

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) | family law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.