Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

family reunification

Read a random definition: computer and internet fraud

A quick definition of family reunification:

Family reunification means bringing a child back to their parents after they were taken away because of abuse or neglect. The government's main goal is to make sure the child is safe and happy, and if it's best for them, they will try to bring them back to their parents. The government will help the parents learn how to take care of their child and make sure they have everything they need. Sometimes, if it's not safe for the child to go back to their parents, they might be adopted by a new family.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Family reunification is the process of returning a child who has been removed from their parents due to abuse or neglect. The goal is to reunite the child with their parents as long as it is in the best interest of the child. The state provides services to the parents to help them provide for their child when they return home.

Example: If a child is removed from their home because their parents are not taking care of them properly, the state will work with the parents to help them improve their parenting skills. If the parents successfully complete the required services, the child can be returned to their care.

Explanation: Family reunification is a process that aims to keep families together while ensuring the safety and well-being of the child. The state provides support to the parents to help them overcome the issues that led to the removal of their child. The example illustrates how the state works with the parents to reunite them with their child after addressing the issues that led to the removal.

family-purpose rule | family settlement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.