Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fee tail

Read a random definition: lex majoris partis

A quick definition of fee tail:

A fee tail is a type of ownership of land where the owner has to pass it on to their children, who then have to pass it on to their children. This is usually written in a special way in a legal document. However, most places in the United States don't allow this type of ownership anymore because it's too complicated. Instead, they use a simpler type of ownership called fee simple. Some places even have a law that changes fee tail ownership into fee simple ownership automatically.

A more thorough explanation:

A fee tail is a type of land ownership that requires the owner to pass the land on to their children, who must then pass it on to their children. This type of ownership is created when a deed uses the words "the heirs of his body." For example, a deed might say "to John Doe and the heirs of his body."

However, fee tails are no longer used in most states because they are seen as burdensome and inefficient. Instead, this language in a deed creates a fee simple ownership, which allows the owner to do whatever they want with the land.

Some states have laws that turn existing fee tail interests into fee simple interests. For example, in Alabama, all existing fee tails are turned into fee simple interests once they are transferred. This can be done through a straw man transaction, where the owner transfers the land to someone else who then transfers it back as a fee simple.

Overall, fee tails are an outdated form of land ownership that are no longer used in most states.

John owns a piece of land in a state that still allows fee tails. He wants to pass the land on to his son, so he creates a deed that says "to John Doe and the heirs of his body." This means that when John dies, the land will automatically pass to his son, who must then pass it on to his own children.

However, if John had created a deed that said "to John Doe," he would have a fee simple ownership and could do whatever he wanted with the land, including passing it on to his son or selling it to someone else.

fee simple | felon

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.