Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

first-sale doctrine

Read a random definition: incidental beneficiary

A quick definition of first-sale doctrine:

The first-sale doctrine is a rule that says when you buy a physical copy of something like a book or CD, you can give it or sell it to someone else without breaking the law. This means that the person who made the thing you bought can't stop you from sharing it with others. The same rule applies to things that have a patent on them, which means the person who invented it can't stop you from using, fixing, or selling it after you buy it. However, there may be some rules in the contract or license that limit what you can do with it.

A more thorough explanation:

The first-sale doctrine is a legal principle that applies to both copyright and patent law. It allows the purchaser of a physical copy of a copyrighted work or a patented article to sell or give away that copy without infringing on the owner's exclusive distribution rights.

Under copyright law, the first-sale doctrine means that if you buy a book or a CD, you can sell or give away that copy to someone else without breaking the law. The copyright owner's distribution right is said to be exhausted with regard to that physical copy.

For example, if you buy a copy of a book and then sell it to a friend, you are not infringing on the author's copyright. The author cannot control what happens to that physical copy of the book once it has been sold.

Under patent law, the first-sale doctrine means that if you buy a patented article, you have the right to use, repair, and resell that article without interference from the patent owner. The patent owner's monopoly right to control the use of the article is said to be exhausted with the first sale.

For example, if you buy a patented tool and then sell it to someone else, you are not infringing on the patent owner's rights. The patent owner cannot control what happens to that physical tool once it has been sold.

However, the patent owner may still be able to retain some control over the article through terms in the license or sale contract. As long as these limitations do not amount to anticompetitive patent misuse, they are allowed under the law.

first refusal, right of | first taker

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.