Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

forfeiture by wrongdoing

Read a random definition: labor law

A quick definition of forfeiture by wrongdoing:

Forfeiture by wrongdoing is a rule that allows a statement made by someone who cannot testify in court to be used as evidence. This rule applies when someone intentionally or wrongly prevents the person from testifying. The party who wants to use the statement as evidence must prove that the other party did something wrong. This rule is important because it helps ensure that people who try to prevent witnesses from testifying cannot benefit from their actions.

A more thorough explanation:

Forfeiture by wrongdoing is a legal term that allows a statement made by a person who is not present in court to be admitted as evidence. This statement is usually considered hearsay and would not be admissible in court. However, if the person who made the statement is unavailable to testify because of the intentional or wrongful actions of the opposing party, the statement can be admitted under the forfeiture by wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rule.

For example, if a defendant in a criminal case threatens a witness to prevent them from testifying, the witness's previous statement to the police or in a deposition may be admitted as evidence under the forfeiture by wrongdoing exception.

This exception is also used in cases where a defendant has killed or harmed a witness to prevent them from testifying. In such cases, the defendant forfeits their right to confront the witness against them under the Sixth Amendment.

Overall, forfeiture by wrongdoing is a legal tool that allows courts to admit evidence that would otherwise be inadmissible due to the hearsay rule or the right to confront witnesses. It is used to prevent parties from benefiting from their own wrongful actions that prevent witnesses from testifying.

forfeiture | forger

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
renard99
14:15
@llama: Man I'd be more than happy to
14:15
LSD is in decay age of social network
renard99
14:15
^LMAO yeah
renard99
14:15
Basically accepted atp that I'm gonna have to R&R so might as well take up some jobs while I'm at it
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.