Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

frauds, statute of

Read a random definition: Lambeth degree

A quick definition of frauds, statute of:

The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the person who will be held responsible for them. This law was first created in England in 1677 to prevent fraud and lies in court. It applies to contracts for the sale of land, contracts that cannot be completed within one year, contracts for goods worth $500 or more, contracts made by an executor or administrator to pay a debt of a deceased person, contracts to guarantee someone else's debt, and contracts made in exchange for marriage. If a contract falls under the Statute of Frauds and is not in writing and signed, it cannot be enforced in court.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged. The purpose of this law is to prevent fraud and perjury in court cases. The law originated in England in 1677 and was titled "An Act for the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries." The statute declared certain contracts unenforceable if they were not in writing and signed by the party to be charged.

Examples: The Statute of Frauds applies to several types of contracts, including:

  • A contract for the sale or transfer of an interest in land
  • A contract that cannot be performed within one year of its making
  • A contract for the sale of goods valued at $500 or more
  • A contract of an executor or administrator to answer for a decedent's debt
  • A contract to guarantee the debt or duty of another
  • A contract made in consideration of marriage

For example, if John promises to sell his house to Jane but they do not put the agreement in writing and sign it, the contract may not be enforceable in court under the Statute of Frauds. This law helps ensure that contracts are clear and agreed upon by all parties involved.

fraud-on-the-market principle | fraudulent act

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.