Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fraud-on-the-market principle

Read a random definition: defeasible

A quick definition of fraud-on-the-market principle:

The fraud-on-the-market principle is a rule that says if someone buys a stock in a public market and the value of the stock is based on false information, they can sue for fraud even if they didn't know the information was false. This is because the market price of the stock reflects all available public information. However, this rule can be challenged. Fraud is when someone lies or hides important information to make someone else do something that hurts them. It can be a crime or a civil wrong.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The fraud-on-the-market principle is a legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff to establish reliance on a misstatement about a security's value without proving actual knowledge of the fraudulent statement. This is possible if the stock is purchased in an open and developed securities market. The doctrine recognizes that the market price of an issuer's stock reflects all available public information. The presumption is rebuttable.

Examples: If a company makes a false statement about its financial health, investors who purchased the company's stock in an open and developed securities market can sue the company for securities fraud. They can use the fraud-on-the-market principle to establish reliance on the false statement without proving that they knew the statement was false. The presumption is that the investors relied on the market price of the stock, which reflected the false statement. The company can rebut this presumption by showing that the investors did not rely on the false statement.

Explanation: The fraud-on-the-market principle is a legal tool that helps investors seek compensation for securities fraud. It recognizes that investors rely on the market price of a stock to make investment decisions. If a company makes a false statement that affects the stock price, investors who purchased the stock can sue the company for securities fraud. The fraud-on-the-market principle allows them to establish reliance on the false statement without proving that they knew the statement was false. This makes it easier for investors to seek compensation for securities fraud.

fraud on the community | frauds, statute of

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.