Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

GAAS

Read a random definition: PER CUR

A quick definition of GAAS:

Term: GAAS

Definition: GAAS stands for Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. These are the rules and guidelines that auditors follow when they are examining a company's financial statements. It helps to ensure that the audit is done correctly and that the financial information is accurate and reliable. Think of it like a set of rules that auditors have to follow to make sure they do their job well.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: GAAS (gas) is an abbreviation for Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. These are a set of guidelines and rules that auditors follow when conducting audits of financial statements. The purpose of GAAS is to ensure that audits are conducted in a consistent and thorough manner, and that the resulting financial statements are reliable and accurate.

Examples: Some examples of GAAS include:

  • Independence: Auditors must be independent of the company being audited, meaning they have no financial or personal interest in the company's success or failure.
  • Adequate planning: Auditors must plan their audit work carefully, including identifying areas of risk and determining the appropriate audit procedures to use.
  • Evidence: Auditors must gather sufficient and appropriate evidence to support their conclusions about the financial statements.
  • Reporting: Auditors must issue a report on their findings, including any material weaknesses or deficiencies in the company's internal controls.

These examples illustrate how GAAS provides a framework for auditors to follow when conducting audits. By adhering to these standards, auditors can ensure that their work is consistent, thorough, and reliable, which helps to maintain the integrity of financial reporting.

GA | gabel

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.