Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

general count

Read a random definition: de die in diem

A quick definition of general count:

A general count is a part of a legal document that accuses someone of doing something wrong. It can be a statement of a claim or a charge for a specific offense. It is usually not too detailed and is used to make sure the plaintiff can take advantage of any ground of liability that the proof may disclose. It can also be used in a priority contest between two or more patent applications. To count means to declare or state the facts that state a claim.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A part of an indictment or complaint that charges the suspect or defendant with a distinct offense or claim. It can be a statement of a distinct claim in a complaint or similar pleading.

Examples:

  • Common count: In a plaintiff's pleading for debt, the common count is a standard language that is not based on the individual case's circumstances. It is intended to guard against a possible variance and enable the plaintiff to take advantage of any ground of liability that the proof may disclose.
  • General count: A count that states the plaintiff's claim without undue particularity.
  • Money count: A count that gives rise to a claim for payment of money, usually founded on a simple contract.
  • Multiple counts: Several separate causes of action or charged offenses contained in a single pleading or indictment.
  • Special count: A section of a pleading in which the plaintiff's claim is stated with great particularity, usually employed only when the pleading rules require specificity.

These examples illustrate how a count can be used in different legal contexts, such as in a plaintiff's pleading for debt or in an indictment charging the suspect with a distinct offense. A general count is a count that states the plaintiff's claim without undue particularity, while a special count is a section of a pleading in which the plaintiff's claim is stated with great particularity. Multiple counts refer to several separate causes of action or charged offenses contained in a single pleading or indictment.

General Counsel's Memorandum | General Court

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.