Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

general court-martial

Read a random definition: insecurity clause

A quick definition of general court-martial:

A general court-martial is a type of military court that is used to try members of the armed forces who are accused of violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It is the highest level of military trial court and is presided over by a military judge and at least five members who serve as jurors. The court has jurisdiction over all members of the armed forces and can impose severe punishments, including dishonorable discharge, imprisonment, and even the death penalty.

A more thorough explanation:

A general court-martial is a type of military court that is convened under military authority to try someone accused of violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice, particularly a member of the armed forces. It is the highest military trial court.

For example, if a soldier is accused of a serious offense like desertion or mutiny, they may be tried in a general court-martial. The court is presided over by a military judge and no fewer than five members who serve as jurors.

Other types of courts-martial include:

  • Special court-martial: An intermediate level of courts-martial that is presided over by a military judge and no fewer than three members to hear noncapital offenses and prescribe a sanction of hard labor, dismissal, or extended confinement (up to six months).
  • Summary court-martial: The lowest level of courts-martial, presided over by a single commissioned officer who is jurisdictionally limited in what sanctions can be imposed.

Overall, courts-martial are used to maintain discipline and order within the military and ensure that members of the armed forces are held accountable for their actions.

General Court | general covenant against encumbrances

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.