Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

general verdict with interrogatories

Read a random definition: binding receipt

A quick definition of general verdict with interrogatories:

A verdict is a decision made by a jury or judge in a court case. It can be a general verdict, where the jury decides in favor of one party or the other, or a special verdict, where the jury only answers specific factual questions and the judge decides the legal effect. A general verdict with interrogatories is a general verdict accompanied by answers to written questions about specific issues of fact. There are also other types of verdicts, such as a directed verdict, where the judge takes the case from the jury because there is only one reasonable verdict based on the evidence.

A more thorough explanation:

A general verdict with interrogatories is a type of verdict in which the jury provides a general decision on the case, but also answers specific questions related to the case. These questions are called interrogatories and are used to clarify the jury's decision.

For example, in a personal injury case, the jury may provide a general verdict that the defendant is liable for the plaintiff's injuries. However, the jury may also answer interrogatories related to the amount of damages the plaintiff should receive for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

This type of verdict is useful when the case involves complex issues that require the jury to make multiple findings of fact. The interrogatories help to ensure that the jury's decision is clear and well-reasoned.

general verdict subject to a special case | general warrant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.