Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

general warrant

Read a random definition: nomocanon

A quick definition of general warrant:

A general warrant is a type of legal document that allows law enforcement officers to search and seize things without specifying exactly what they are looking for. This is not allowed because it violates the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which requires warrants to be specific and based on probable cause. General warrants were used in the past to arrest people for saying things the government didn't like, but they were banned in 1766. Nowadays, warrants must be specific and based on evidence.

A more thorough explanation:

A general warrant is a type of warrant that gives a law-enforcement officer broad authority to search and seize unspecified places or persons. It is a search or arrest warrant that lacks a sufficiently particularized description of the person or thing to be seized or the place to be searched. General warrants are unconstitutional because they fail to meet the Fourth Amendment's specificity requirements.

For example, a general warrant might authorize a police officer to search any house in a particular neighborhood without specifying which house or what they are looking for. This type of warrant is illegal because it violates the Fourth Amendment's requirement that warrants be based on probable cause and describe with particularity the place to be searched and the things to be seized.

General warrants were banned by Parliament in 1766 after they were used by the English Secretary of State to arrest the author, printer, or publisher of a seditious libel without naming the persons to be arrested. The practice of issuing general warrants continued in the United States until the landmark case of Money v. Leach in 1763, in which the warrant was declared void by the whole court of king's bench.

general verdict with interrogatories | general warranty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.