Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hazardous substance

Read a random definition: default divorce

A quick definition of hazardous substance:

A hazardous substance is a dangerous chemical or mixture that can cause harm to people or the environment. It can be toxic and cause serious health problems. Hazardous substances can also be waste material that is left over after a manufacturing or chemical process. Toxic waste is an example of hazardous waste that can cause harm to people and the environment. It is important to handle and dispose of hazardous substances and waste properly to prevent harm.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A hazardous substance is a toxic pollutant or an imminently dangerous chemical or mixture that may cause harm to human health or the environment. It can also refer to refuse or superfluous material, especially that remaining after a manufacturing or chemical process.

Examples: Examples of hazardous substances include toxic waste, such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and other substances that may cause harm to human health or the environment. Hazardous substances can be found in many industries, including manufacturing, agriculture, and healthcare.

Explanation: Hazardous substances are dangerous and can cause harm to human health and the environment. They need to be handled and disposed of properly to prevent harm. For example, toxic waste needs to be disposed of in a way that does not harm the environment or human health. Hazardous substances can also be found in workplaces, and employees need to be trained on how to handle them safely to prevent accidents and injuries.

hazardous negligence | hazardous waste

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.