Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

in mancipio

Read a random definition: diplomatic immunity

A quick definition of in mancipio:

Term: IN MANCIPIO

Definition: In ancient Rome, if someone did something wrong, their father or owner could be sued for damages. This was called a noxal action. If the father or owner didn't want to pay, they could give their son or slave to the person they owed money to. This meant the son or slave was in mancipio, which meant they were in a state of civil bondage. They had to work for the person they were given to until the debt was paid off. Animals could also be given up if they caused damage.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: In mancipio (in man-sip-ee-oh) is a Latin term used in Roman law to describe a state of civil bondage. It refers to the status of a son who is handed over by his father to settle a claim in a noxal action.

Example: If a son committed a tort (a wrongful act) in Roman times, the injured party could sue the father for damages. The father could either pay the penalty or surrender his son to the injured party, putting him in mancipio.

Explanation: This means that the son would be in a state of civil bondage, essentially becoming the property of the injured party until the debt was paid off. This was a common practice in Roman law, where family members were held responsible for each other's actions.

Additional Example: Another example of a noxal action would be if someone's animal caused damage to another person's property. The injured party could sue the owner of the animal, who would then have to pay the penalty or surrender the animal to the injured party.

Explanation: This shows how the concept of in mancipio applied not only to human family members but also to animals. It was a way of holding people accountable for the actions of those under their care or ownership.

in majorem evidentiam | in manu mortua

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
23:12
Windy wya
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.