Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

in rem

Read a random definition: ca. sa

A quick definition of in rem:

In rem: A fancy Latin term that means "against a thing." It's when a court has the power to make decisions about property. This is different from when a court makes decisions about people (called in personam). The court can do this even if the owner of the property is not in the same place as the court. There are two types of in rem: true in rem, which affects everyone, and quasi in rem, which only affects certain people. For example, if someone gets hurt in someone else's house and can't find the owner, they can sue the house itself (quasi in rem) to get money for their injuries.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: In rem is a Latin term that means "against a thing." It refers to a court's power to make decisions about property. In rem jurisdiction is one of two types of personal jurisdiction. A court can use in rem jurisdiction to make decisions about any real or personal property within its area. This means that a court can make decisions about property even if the owner is not in the court's area.

For example, if someone files a lawsuit to get a mechanic's lien on a property, they are using in rem jurisdiction. This is because a mechanic's lien requires the court to transfer ownership of the property. The court can use in rem jurisdiction to make this decision, even if the property owner is not in the court's area.

There are two types of in rem jurisdiction:

  • True in rem: This type of in rem jurisdiction is binding against the world. This means that if someone wins a true in rem lawsuit, everyone is barred from challenging the owner's title in the future. An example of a true in rem lawsuit is an action to quiet title.
  • Quasi in rem: This type of in rem jurisdiction is only binding against individual parties. An example of a quasi in rem lawsuit is if someone is injured in someone else's house and cannot get personal jurisdiction over the owner. They can file a lawsuit against the house instead. If they win, the house will be sold to pay for damages.

These examples illustrate how in rem jurisdiction works. In both cases, the court is making decisions about property instead of people. This means that the court can use in rem jurisdiction even if the property owner is not in the court's area.

in re | in terrorem clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.