Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Quasi in rem

Read a random definition: in casu proviso

A quick definition of Quasi in rem:

Quasi in rem is a type of legal action where a court can only affect a named defendant's interest in a specific piece of property. There are two types of quasi in rem actions: subtype 1, where a plaintiff can sue to enforce a pre-existing interest in the named property, and subtype 2, where a plaintiff can sue to apply the named property to satisfy their claim against the property's owner, even if the claim is unrelated to the property. The outcome of a quasi in rem case only affects the plaintiff's claim against the named property and does not affect their future claims against other properties or the property's actual owner. Courts may not exercise quasi in rem subtype 2 jurisdiction where it would be unreasonable to do so.

A more thorough explanation:

Quasi in rem is a type of legal action where a court can only affect a named defendant's interest in a specific named piece of property. There are two types of quasi in rem actions:

In this type of action, a plaintiff may sue to enforce a pre-existing interest in the named property. For example, a lender might use a quasi in rem subtype 1 action to foreclose a mortgage.

In this type of action, a plaintiff may sue to apply the named property to satisfy his or her claim against the property's owner, where the plaintiff's claim is unrelated to the property. This type of action is technically against the named property, not the property's owner. Thus, the outcome of the case is final regarding the plaintiff's claim against the named property and does not affect the plaintiff's future claim against other pieces of property or the property's actual owner. For example, an American plaintiff injured by a reckless driver while vacationing in a foreign country might use a quasi in rem subtype 2 to recover from the driver if American courts could not obtain personal jurisdiction over him.

It is important to note that courts may not exercise quasi in rem subtype 2 jurisdiction where it would be unreasonable to do so.

Overall, quasi in rem actions have similarities with both in rem and in personam actions. As is the case with in rem actions, a court may hear a quasi in rem action if the named property is within the court's jurisdiction, even if the court does not have the power to exercise in personam jurisdiction over the defendant. However, a court acting quasi in rem may only affect the interests of a single, named defendant, as is the case in an in personam action.

Examples of quasi in rem actions include a plaintiff suing to foreclose a mortgage on a specific property (quasi in rem subtype 1) or a plaintiff suing to recover damages from a reckless driver by applying the value of the driver's property to satisfy the plaintiff's claim (quasi in rem subtype 2).

These examples illustrate how quasi in rem actions are limited to affecting a named defendant's interest in a specific named piece of property, rather than the defendant's overall assets or personal liability.

quasi contract (or quasi-contract) | Quasi-community property

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.