Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inadequate consideration

Read a random definition: judgment ex cathedra

A quick definition of inadequate consideration:

Inadequate consideration means that something given or promised in exchange for a promise is not fair or reasonable under the circumstances of the agreement. Consideration is something that motivates a person to do something, especially to engage in a legal act. It can be an act, a forbearance, or a return promise. Consideration, or a substitute such as promissory estoppel, is necessary for an agreement to be enforceable. Adequate consideration is consideration that is fair and reasonable under the circumstances of the agreement. Valuable consideration is consideration that is valid under the law and either confers a pecuniarily measurable benefit on one party or imposes a pecuniarily measurable detriment on the other.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Inadequate consideration refers to a situation where the value of the consideration exchanged in a contract is not fair or reasonable under the circumstances of the agreement. Consideration is something of value that is bargained for and received by a promisor from a promisee, and it is necessary for an agreement to be enforceable.

Example: A agrees to sell his car to B for $1. This is an example of inadequate consideration because the value of the car is much higher than $1. The transaction may be considered a gift or a fraud, and it may not be enforceable.

Explanation: In this example, the value of the car is not commensurate with the amount of consideration exchanged. The consideration is inadequate because it does not reflect the fair value of the car. As a result, the transaction may not be enforceable, and it may be considered a gift or a fraud. Inadequate consideration can render a contract unenforceable because it suggests that the parties did not enter into the agreement with a meeting of the minds or with the intention to create a legally binding contract.

inactive stock | inadequate remedy at law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
probably my WE and softs. Do reapplicants have lower chances at admissions? I've read few negative things but I dont wanna like poison my brain with those lol.
Also, do i have to write new personal statements if i reapply?
hi jack :)
calling dean cooper as we speak to get you an A
you do have to write new personal statements but applicants aren’t disfavored
especially if you’re reapplying with a higher lsat
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: i just looked at your stats and do not take this the wrong way in any way but how the hell did nyu or cls not take you. this is insane
178 lsat is a crazy work dude
i had a silly guy era and had two years of withdrawn classes. like 15 total, so a lot of schools were not willing to take a chance on me
soap
13:55
If you're already on the WL when you get a higher LSAT, are you already cooked?
their loss lol. any tips for LSAT LR? I used 7sage and kinda hated it. I have Loophole that I plan on using whenever I retake lsat probably in summer
@soap: you are more cooked than if you were not already waitlisted, but you are not completely cooked and raising your lsat is the strongest thing you can do for a WL
soap
13:58
Volatile, I always do the hardest ones first, so that you get the most challenging questions out of the way and make it get easier as you proceed. Also, read the answer choices before reading the question.
soap
13:58
Man if I get above 175 and end up not getting into any t14s I'll laugh
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: biggest tip that will get you a few points is that the LSAT doesn’t actually use “most correct” like it claims. there’s actually only ever one right answer and every other answer will be excluded by one rule of logic or another. so only one answer will ever be completely correct
is there like a cheat sheet or a study guide type of thing for specific forms of questions? I remember I struggled the most with NA/SA/PSA
@soap: if you get above a 175 you should just reapply because you’d probably be competitive for penn nyu and cls at that point with scholly money
I scored 156 on my first LSAT in August, I cancelled that and retook it immediately in September and got 163. Do yall think I can cross into 170's if I start studying from like january to summer
because i've heard that any score increase after 165 is just as hard as from 145 to 160
soap
14:01
I've been told by my parents that I cannot reapply because I have the full ride to UMN and so I better take whatever I can get lol
texaslawhopefully
14:01
I’m going to have to disagree with soap on the point of doing the hardest questions first. I think it’s just a general waste of time to over complicate your strategy. You’re going to have do all the questions anyone. Ignore the clock and focus on one question at a time.
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: it gets harder to increase your score as you go up, but if you work hard and consistently work on your mistakes it’s entirely possible you break 170
got it thank u guys
@soap: lol oh well just get top 10% a umn and then transfer to harvard because you come from a grade deflated undergrad and law school will be easy for you
soap
14:02
I think the order in which you do questions is a matter of personal preference. In PTs I've always scored better doing the hardest ones first, but that's just because it reduces the stress personally lol
soap
14:02
I guess since I'm paying for all this anyhow I could just wait and reapply lmao
texaslawhopefully
14:03
Yeah soap if you get a 175+, I would 100 percent reapply
hahahahah sure if you’re set on t14 it’s entirely attainable for you
texaslawhopefully
14:03
If your parents aren’t helping at all, they don’t have much of a say
14:08
^valid pt
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.