Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inadequate remedy at law

Read a random definition: shop committee

A quick definition of inadequate remedy at law:

Term: Inadequate Remedy at Law

Definition: When someone has been wronged, sometimes just giving them money isn't enough to fix the problem. In these cases, a court might give them an injunction, which is like a special order to make the other person stop doing the bad thing. This is called an inadequate remedy at law. The court will only give an injunction if there's no other way to fix the problem. This is called the irreparable-injury rule, but sometimes courts don't follow it exactly.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An inadequate remedy at law refers to a solution that does not fully correct a wrong. In such cases, a court may provide an injunction to the disadvantaged party instead of monetary damages.

For example, if a company is using a trademark that belongs to another company, the owner of the trademark may seek an injunction to stop the infringing company from using the trademark. This is because monetary damages may not be enough to fully correct the harm caused by the infringement.

The principle of an inadequate remedy at law is also known as the irreparable-injury rule. This rule states that equitable relief, such as an injunction, is only available when there is no adequate legal remedy, such as monetary damages. However, courts do not always follow this rule strictly in practice.

Overall, an inadequate remedy at law refers to a situation where monetary damages are not enough to fully correct a wrong, and an injunction may be necessary to provide a more complete solution.

inadequate consideration | in adversum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.