Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

increased-risk-of-harm doctrine

Read a random definition: usque ad

A quick definition of increased-risk-of-harm doctrine:

The increased-risk-of-harm doctrine, also known as the loss-of-chance doctrine, is a rule in some states that allows a patient to sue a doctor for medical malpractice even if the malpractice did not directly cause a specific injury. Instead, the doctrine allows for a claim if the malpractice decreased or eliminated the chance of surviving or recovering from the preexisting condition for which the doctor was consulted.

A more thorough explanation:

The increased-risk-of-harm doctrine, also known as the loss-of-chance doctrine, is a legal rule in some states that allows a patient to sue a doctor for medical malpractice even if the malpractice did not directly cause a particular injury. Instead, the doctrine applies when the malpractice decreases or eliminates the chance of surviving or recovering from a preexisting condition for which the doctor was consulted.

For example, suppose a patient has a 50% chance of surviving a particular type of cancer if it is caught early and treated properly. If a doctor fails to diagnose the cancer until it has progressed to a later stage, and the patient's chance of survival drops to 10%, the patient may be able to sue the doctor for the lost chance of survival, even if the malpractice did not directly cause the patient's death.

The increased-risk-of-harm doctrine is controversial because it can be difficult to prove that the malpractice caused the lost chance of survival or recovery. However, some states have adopted the doctrine as a way to provide compensation to patients who have suffered harm due to medical negligence.

increase, costs of | increment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.