Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

loss-of-chance doctrine

Read a random definition: concurrent resolution of Congress

A quick definition of loss-of-chance doctrine:

The loss-of-chance doctrine is a rule in some states that allows a person to sue a doctor for medical malpractice even if the malpractice did not directly cause an injury. This rule applies when the malpractice decreases or eliminates the chance of surviving or recovering from a preexisting condition for which the doctor was consulted. It is also known as the lost-chance doctrine or increased-risk-of-harm doctrine.

A more thorough explanation:

The loss-of-chance doctrine is a legal rule that allows a patient to sue a doctor for medical malpractice if the doctor's actions decrease or eliminate the chance of surviving or recovering from a preexisting condition. This rule applies even if the malpractice did not directly cause the injury.

For example, if a patient has a 50% chance of surviving cancer with proper treatment, but a doctor's negligence reduces that chance to 10%, the patient may be able to sue the doctor for the lost chance of survival.

Another example is if a doctor fails to diagnose a condition in a timely manner, and the delay reduces the patient's chance of recovery, the patient may be able to sue the doctor for the lost chance of recovery.

These examples illustrate how the loss-of-chance doctrine allows patients to seek compensation for the harm caused by a doctor's negligence, even if the harm is not immediate or direct.

loss leader | loss-of-use exclusion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.