Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ineffective assistance of counsel

Read a random definition: Interpol

A quick definition of ineffective assistance of counsel:

Ineffective assistance of counsel: When someone is accused of a crime, they have the right to a good lawyer who will help them in court. But sometimes, the lawyer doesn't do a good job and makes mistakes that hurt the person's case. If this happens, the person can try to get their conviction overturned by saying they had "ineffective assistance of counsel." To prove this, they have to show that their lawyer did a bad job and that it probably changed the outcome of the trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to a situation where a defendant's lawyer did not provide adequate legal representation, which resulted in an unfair trial. The right to counsel includes the right to effective assistance of counsel. If a defendant can prove that their lawyer was ineffective, they may be able to get their conviction overturned. This is a common claim in habeas corpus cases.

To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show two things:

  1. That their lawyer's performance was below an "objective standard of reasonableness."
  2. "A reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different."

For example, if a defendant's lawyer failed to call a key witness who could have provided an alibi, and the defendant was convicted, they may be able to argue that their lawyer was ineffective. If the defendant can show that the witness would have changed the outcome of the trial, they may be able to get their conviction overturned.

industrial unionism | inequity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.