Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ineffective revocation

Read a random definition: not proven

A quick definition of ineffective revocation:

Ineffective revocation is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person tries to cancel their will, but the cancellation is not valid because it was conditional or mistaken. This is also known as the dependent relative revocation doctrine. For example, if someone tears up their will because they believe a new one is valid, but the new will is not legally binding, the old will may still be considered valid. However, this doctrine does not always achieve the person's intended outcome or make an invalid will valid.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ineffective revocation is a legal term that refers to the dependent relative revocation doctrine. This doctrine is a common-law principle that operates to undo an otherwise sufficient revocation of a will when there is evidence that the testator's revocation was conditional rather than absolute.

For example, if a testator physically revokes their will and believes that a new will is valid, although this belief is mistaken, the doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply. The doctrine undoes only the revocation, but it does not always accomplish the testator's intent or validate an otherwise invalid will.

The dependent relative revocation doctrine is also known as conditional revocation, mistakenly induced revocation, or the doctrine of ineffective revocation.

Examples:

  • A testator revokes their will because they believe that a new will is valid, but the new will is not properly executed. The doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply to undo the revocation of the original will.
  • A testator revokes their will because they believe that a beneficiary has died, but the beneficiary is actually alive. The doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply to undo the revocation of the original will.

These examples illustrate how the doctrine of ineffective revocation operates to undo a revocation that was conditional or based on mistaken beliefs. The doctrine aims to ensure that the testator's true intentions are carried out, even if they made a mistake in revoking their will.

inebriated | Ineligibility Clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. It's a plus for the state as well, since it's not like they're going to let him make bail. Any time up to the trial he'll just spend in jail
windyMagician
12:19
they got unbiased panels for Nikolas Cruz and Daniel Penny, it'll be fine
snow
12:19
yeah, but I think those were capital cases
snow
12:19
jury selection is different for capital cases
windyMagician
12:19
Daniel penny was not a capital case
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:19
@windyMagician: I would say depends the prison, I have met a lot of golden spoon children who could not handle the strictness of the military and lack of freedom. So many attempted suicides. I am sure prison is much worse
snow
12:20
ohh the subway guy, my b
windyMagician
12:20
not tryna be racist but he just needs to stick with the italians
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:21
I do not believe they found a truly un-biased case for Daniel Penny. Finding someone in new york who hasn't been in a subway cart while criming is happening? Idk the statistic of those who witness or are victims of crimes on subway carts but I am sure it is very high
windyMagician
12:21
that's a good thing. juries should be biased in favor of the defense.
Honestly, that would be an incredible arc. Goes to NYS prison, gets taken under the wing of some geriatric wiseguys, then gets out and re-starts the Mob
snow
12:21
in theory yes, the defense did really good with that jury
windyMagician
12:22
we have a presumption of innocence in this country, time to start acting like it
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:22
@windyMagician: I can agree with that, makes it more of a jury of peers if they have been in the same shit show
snow
12:22
YES, im so tired of sitting through jury selection and people not understanding that a jury trial isnt an argument between two sides. its one side trying to prove without a reasonable doubt that someone did what they are accused of
windyMagician
12:23
unrelated but my gym crush date was fucking weird. had a great convo, didn't hug me at the end tho, then says he'll text me and doesn't? girl I'm too old for ghosting
If he wanted to he would girl
Don't give him the benefit of the doubt
windyMagician
12:24
why we're still acting like this at nearly 30 years old I do not know
Although I can respect the not hugging part after a gym date. When I'm finished with lifting, I have an incredibly potent odor that could overpower a delicate female
So I try to keep my distance
windyMagician
12:26
oh it wasn't a gym date it was dinner lmfao
windyMagician
12:26
but he was my crush from the gym
Understood. His behavior is unforgiveable and you should egg his car.
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:27
@windyMagician: did you approach your gym crush you they approach you?
windyMagician
12:27
matched on hinge
who messaged first
windyMagician
12:27
me
girl... you did this to yourself
windyMagician
12:27
I need to add some important context here: he used to date my ex's coworker
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.