Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ineffective revocation

Read a random definition: double use

A quick definition of ineffective revocation:

Ineffective revocation is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person tries to cancel their will, but the cancellation is not valid because it was conditional or mistaken. This is also known as the dependent relative revocation doctrine. For example, if someone tears up their will because they believe a new one is valid, but the new will is not legally binding, the old will may still be considered valid. However, this doctrine does not always achieve the person's intended outcome or make an invalid will valid.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ineffective revocation is a legal term that refers to the dependent relative revocation doctrine. This doctrine is a common-law principle that operates to undo an otherwise sufficient revocation of a will when there is evidence that the testator's revocation was conditional rather than absolute.

For example, if a testator physically revokes their will and believes that a new will is valid, although this belief is mistaken, the doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply. The doctrine undoes only the revocation, but it does not always accomplish the testator's intent or validate an otherwise invalid will.

The dependent relative revocation doctrine is also known as conditional revocation, mistakenly induced revocation, or the doctrine of ineffective revocation.

Examples:

  • A testator revokes their will because they believe that a new will is valid, but the new will is not properly executed. The doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply to undo the revocation of the original will.
  • A testator revokes their will because they believe that a beneficiary has died, but the beneficiary is actually alive. The doctrine of ineffective revocation may apply to undo the revocation of the original will.

These examples illustrate how the doctrine of ineffective revocation operates to undo a revocation that was conditional or based on mistaken beliefs. The doctrine aims to ensure that the testator's true intentions are carried out, even if they made a mistake in revoking their will.

inebriated | Ineligibility Clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.