Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Ineligibility Clause

Read a random definition: Field Code

A quick definition of Ineligibility Clause:

An ineligibility clause is a rule in the U.S. Constitution that says a member of Congress cannot take a job in the government if that job was created or given more money while they were serving in Congress. This is to prevent conflicts of interest and keep the government fair.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The Ineligibility Clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that prohibits a member of Congress from accepting an appointment to an executive office that was created, or the compensation for which was increased, during the member's service in Congress. This means that a member of Congress cannot be appointed to a government position that they helped create or increase the salary for while serving in Congress.

Example: If a member of Congress helped pass a law that created a new government agency, they cannot be appointed to lead that agency while they are still serving in Congress. Similarly, if a member of Congress voted to increase the salary for a particular government position, they cannot be appointed to that position while they are still serving in Congress.

Explanation: The Ineligibility Clause is designed to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that members of Congress are not using their positions to benefit themselves. By prohibiting members of Congress from accepting appointments to positions they helped create or increase the salary for, the clause helps to maintain the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government.

ineffective revocation | ineligible

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.