Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

innocent trespasser

Read a random definition: letter of comfort

A quick definition of innocent trespasser:

An innocent trespasser is someone who enters someone else's property without permission, but they did not mean to do anything wrong. This could be someone who accidentally wandered onto the property or someone who thought they had the right to be there. Even though they did not mean to cause harm, they are still considered a trespasser. The owner of the property does not have a duty to protect them from any harm that may come to them while on the property.

A more thorough explanation:

An innocent trespasser is someone who enters another person's property without permission or legal right, but does so unintentionally or with a belief that they have the right to do so.

For example, if someone is hiking in the woods and accidentally wanders onto private property, they would be considered an innocent trespasser. Similarly, if someone enters a building thinking it is open to the public, but it is actually closed, they would also be an innocent trespasser.

It is important to note that while innocent trespassers may not have intended to break the law, they are still liable for any damage they may cause while on the property. Additionally, property owners are not typically held responsible for injuries sustained by innocent trespassers, as they did not have permission to be on the property in the first place.

innocent trespass | innocuae utilitatis

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.