Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inquest

Read a random definition: ebb and flow

A quick definition of inquest:

An inquest is a type of investigation that happens when someone dies in a mysterious or suspicious way. A group of people called a coroner and/or jury try to figure out how the person died, like if it was an accident or if someone hurt them on purpose. If they find out that someone did something wrong, that person might get in trouble with the law. Sometimes, an inquest can also happen for other reasons, like if a group of people need to investigate something important. A long time ago, kings used inquests to learn about their people and make important decisions. Today, coroners still use inquests to investigate deaths and figure out what happened.

A more thorough explanation:

An inquest is a type of judicial inquiry that investigates the cause of death of an individual who died under suspicious or mysterious circumstances. It is usually conducted by a coroner and/or jury, and the result of the inquest determines the type of death involved, such as natural, suicide, murder, or accidental. If culpability is found to have contributed to the individual's death, a criminal prosecution may follow.

However, an inquest can also refer to a body of jurors summoned to investigate certain circumstances, such as an individual's mental condition. A grand jury is sometimes known as a grand inquest.

The inquest system originated in medieval Europe, where kings used it to maintain their power and authority throughout their domains. They would bring together various peoples from throughout the regions of their empire and deliberate with them to learn what they felt to be the most important rights. Once these kings determined which rights were considered, the local governments throughout the empire adopted and established these rights.

When William of Normandy invaded England in 1066, he used an inquest to obtain information about the people living in England, which he then used to write the Domesday Book, a census that recorded land ownership throughout England.

The coroner office was established during the Middle Ages, and the coroner was a government official who compiled records of accusations, government transactions, public financial matters, and decisions from lower courts. The coroner also had the power to hold inquests to investigate mysterious deaths. Today, coroners still use the inquest procedure for investigating deaths.

Examples of inquests include investigating the cause of death of a person who died in prison or under suspicious circumstances, or investigating an individual's mental condition in a court case.

These examples illustrate how an inquest is a type of judicial inquiry that investigates specific circumstances to determine the cause of an event or situation.

innuendo | INS

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
when stats are close because of the variability you want a little above your stats and a little below to get more data, adcoms arent so finnicky that 2 points on the lsat is make or break unless it puts you above median, and even then 50% are below median so it's not as big of an impact as you might think. the reason the chanceme tool goes a little above and below your stats by default is to capture a more accurate picture
ie your softs/WE/essays might make you more or less competitive than any random applicant and the best way to account for that is to take a little above and a little below
15:21
got it, I was of the mindset that medians are pretty concrete so taking a +2 LSAT score range was just giving me irrelevant data. Thank you
15:21
Def my softs/essays are the strongest part of my application so hoping they shine through
they kind of are but you see with the data here is doesnt really change your chances going from 172 to 170
yeah youll be in a good place for this cycle
15:22
yeah I guess thats true, I've also been looking at "Included" not "Only" for URM so maybe that's a diff too
15:22
Appreciate it man!
yeah included is giving you data for nURM which isnt relevant for your cycle
and ofc, good luck :)
15:24
Holiday messages from law schools should be illegal
jackfrost11770
15:27
the cornell one actually gave me a heart attack no joke
15:28
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Thanks! Will def update you as they come out hahaha
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.