Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

irremediable or irretrievable breakdown

Read a random definition: redistrict

A quick definition of irremediable or irretrievable breakdown:

Irremediable or irretrievable breakdown is a reason why some couples get divorced. It means that the marriage is broken and cannot be fixed. In many U.S. states, couples can get a divorce without having to prove who is to blame for the breakdown of the marriage. This is called a no-fault divorce. It is available in all 50 states.

A more thorough explanation:

Irremediable or irretrievable breakdown

Irremediable or irretrievable breakdown is a common reason for a no-fault divorce in many U.S. states. It means that the marriage has broken down beyond repair and cannot be fixed. Courts do not investigate the reasons for the divorce, but instead focus on whether the marriage is irretrievably broken.

Example 1: John and Jane have been married for 10 years, but they have grown apart and no longer love each other. They have tried counseling, but it has not helped. They decide to get a divorce because their marriage is irretrievably broken.

Example 2: Tom and Sarah have been married for 20 years, but Tom has been cheating on Sarah for the past year. Sarah is devastated and wants a divorce. She files for divorce on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown because she believes that their marriage cannot be saved.

These examples illustrate the definition of irretrievable breakdown because in both cases, the couples have tried to fix their marriage but have been unsuccessful. The marriages have broken down beyond repair, and the only option is to get a divorce. The courts would grant a divorce based on irretrievable breakdown in both cases.

irrelevant | irreparable harm

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.