Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-fault divorce

Read a random definition: non-accelerated filer

A quick definition of no-fault divorce:

No-fault divorce is a way to end a marriage without having to prove that one person did something wrong. Instead, one person can say that the marriage isn't working and that's enough to get a divorce. This is different from the old way of getting a divorce, which required someone to prove that their spouse did something bad like cheating or being mean. No-fault divorce is now allowed in all states and it's usually faster and less public than the old way of getting a divorce.

A more thorough explanation:

No-fault divorce is a type of divorce where a person can end their marriage without having to prove that their spouse did something wrong. In the past, people had to show that their spouse was cruel, committed adultery, or deserted them in order to get a divorce. But with no-fault divorce, the person filing for divorce only needs to say that the marriage has broken down and they can't get along anymore.

For example, if a couple has been arguing a lot and can't seem to work things out, one of them can file for a no-fault divorce. They don't have to prove that the other person did something wrong, they just need to say that the marriage isn't working.

No-fault divorce is now recognized in all states, and many have adopted pure no-fault divorce where fault divorces are no longer allowed. This means that a person can only get a divorce by claiming that the marriage has broken down and they can't get along anymore.

There are some benefits to no-fault divorce. It is more private because the couple doesn't have to share the intimate details of their marriage in court. However, fault divorces can result in greater shares of the marital property or more alimony for the filing spouse than a no-fault divorce.

No-fault divorce became popular in the 1970s as an alternative to the tactics of perjury and forum-shopping employed by some unhappy couples to bypass their state's fault divorce laws. However, critics of pure no-fault divorce blame it for many social ills, including rising divorce rates, increased bad marital behavior and domestic violence, and the destruction of the concept of mutual interdependence that was traditionally central to marriage.

no-contest clause | no-fault insurance

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.