Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-fault divorce

Read a random definition: fraud

A quick definition of no-fault divorce:

No-fault divorce is a way to end a marriage without having to prove that one person did something wrong. Instead, one person can say that the marriage isn't working and that's enough to get a divorce. This is different from the old way of getting a divorce, which required someone to prove that their spouse did something bad like cheating or being mean. No-fault divorce is now allowed in all states and it's usually faster and less public than the old way of getting a divorce.

A more thorough explanation:

No-fault divorce is a type of divorce where a person can end their marriage without having to prove that their spouse did something wrong. In the past, people had to show that their spouse was cruel, committed adultery, or deserted them in order to get a divorce. But with no-fault divorce, the person filing for divorce only needs to say that the marriage has broken down and they can't get along anymore.

For example, if a couple has been arguing a lot and can't seem to work things out, one of them can file for a no-fault divorce. They don't have to prove that the other person did something wrong, they just need to say that the marriage isn't working.

No-fault divorce is now recognized in all states, and many have adopted pure no-fault divorce where fault divorces are no longer allowed. This means that a person can only get a divorce by claiming that the marriage has broken down and they can't get along anymore.

There are some benefits to no-fault divorce. It is more private because the couple doesn't have to share the intimate details of their marriage in court. However, fault divorces can result in greater shares of the marital property or more alimony for the filing spouse than a no-fault divorce.

No-fault divorce became popular in the 1970s as an alternative to the tactics of perjury and forum-shopping employed by some unhappy couples to bypass their state's fault divorce laws. However, critics of pure no-fault divorce blame it for many social ills, including rising divorce rates, increased bad marital behavior and domestic violence, and the destruction of the concept of mutual interdependence that was traditionally central to marriage.

no-contest clause | no-fault insurance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.