Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

joint tortfeasors

Read a random definition: UGMA

A quick definition of joint tortfeasors:

Joint tortfeasors are two or more people who together cause harm to someone else because of their carelessness. They can be held responsible for paying all the damages, even if one person was more at fault than the others. For example, if two friends were driving a car and caused an accident, they would be joint tortfeasors and could both be sued for the damages.

A more thorough explanation:

Joint tortfeasors are two or more people who are collectively responsible for causing harm or damages to another person due to their negligence in a single accident or event. They can be held jointly and severally liable for the damages, which means that any of them can be responsible for paying the entire amount, regardless of their individual level of responsibility.

For example, in the case of Cadran v. Fanni, the court found that the driver who caused the accident and the owner of the car that was being driven were joint tortfeasors. This means that both the driver and the owner could be held responsible for paying damages to the other party.

Another example of joint tortfeasors could be two construction workers who are both responsible for a safety violation that leads to an accident on a job site. Both workers could be held jointly and severally liable for any damages or injuries that result from the accident.

Overall, joint tortfeasors are individuals who share responsibility for causing harm or damages to another person, and can be held accountable for paying damages together or individually.

joint tenancy | joint venture

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.