Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judicial sequestration

Read a random definition: air-quality criteria

A quick definition of judicial sequestration:

Term: Judicial Sequestration

Definition: Judicial sequestration is a legal process where a court orders the seizure or freezing of assets or property belonging to a person or entity involved in a legal dispute. This is done to prevent the assets from being used or transferred until the dispute is resolved. It is a way to ensure that the assets are available to satisfy any judgment or settlement that may be awarded by the court.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Judicial sequestration is a legal process where a court orders the seizure of property or assets to prevent them from being used or sold until a dispute is resolved.

For example, if two parties are in a legal dispute over ownership of a piece of land, a court may order judicial sequestration of the land to prevent either party from selling or using it until the dispute is settled.

Another example could be in a bankruptcy case, where a court may order the sequestration of a debtor's assets to prevent them from being sold or transferred while the bankruptcy proceedings are ongoing.

These examples illustrate how judicial sequestration is used to protect property or assets from being used or sold during a legal dispute or proceeding.

judicial restraint | judicial settlement

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:45
remembering the lsat?
18:45
yur
18:45
I’ve been doing that too you’ll be fine
18:45
i just saw that some kids a year below me in high school are starting at good ass schools too fuckkk
18:46
what are good ass schools to you?
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.