Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judicial sequestration

Read a random definition: loss of consortium

A quick definition of judicial sequestration:

Term: Judicial Sequestration

Definition: Judicial sequestration is a legal process where a court orders the seizure or freezing of assets or property belonging to a person or entity involved in a legal dispute. This is done to prevent the assets from being used or transferred until the dispute is resolved. It is a way to ensure that the assets are available to satisfy any judgment or settlement that may be awarded by the court.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Judicial sequestration is a legal process where a court orders the seizure of property or assets to prevent them from being used or sold until a dispute is resolved.

For example, if two parties are in a legal dispute over ownership of a piece of land, a court may order judicial sequestration of the land to prevent either party from selling or using it until the dispute is settled.

Another example could be in a bankruptcy case, where a court may order the sequestration of a debtor's assets to prevent them from being sold or transferred while the bankruptcy proceedings are ongoing.

These examples illustrate how judicial sequestration is used to protect property or assets from being used or sold during a legal dispute or proceeding.

judicial restraint | judicial settlement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.