Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jurisdictional amount

Read a random definition: qualifying share

A quick definition of jurisdictional amount:

Definition: Jurisdictional amount is the amount of money a person asks for in a lawsuit. It can also include the value of non-money things like an order to stop someone from doing something. If someone wants to sue in a court that handles cases between people from different states, they have to ask for more than $75,000. The court will usually believe them if they say they need that much money, unless the other side can prove they don't. Sometimes, people can add up different claims to reach the $75,000. Some states have their own rules about how much money someone can ask for in a lawsuit.

A more thorough explanation:

Jurisdictional amount refers to the amount of money a plaintiff requests in a lawsuit. It can also include the monetary value of non-monetary remedies, such as an injunction. The jurisdictional amount is important because it determines which court has the authority to hear the case.

For example, if a plaintiff wants to file a lawsuit in federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, they must request more than $75,000 in damages. If the plaintiff requests less than $75,000, the case must be filed in state court instead.

It's important to note that the jurisdictional amount is determined at the beginning of the trial. Even if a jury ultimately awards the plaintiff less than the requested amount, the court still has jurisdiction over the case.

Other situations where jurisdictional amount is relevant include class action lawsuits and state court systems with tiered jurisdictional requirements.

  • A plaintiff files a lawsuit in federal court, claiming $100,000 in damages. This meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for diversity jurisdiction.
  • A plaintiff files a class action lawsuit in federal court, claiming $4,000,000 in damages. This meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for class action lawsuits under the Class Action Fairness Act.
  • A plaintiff files a lawsuit in Massachusetts small claims court, claiming $10,000 in damages. This exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims court, so the case must be filed in a higher court.

These examples illustrate how the jurisdictional amount determines which court has the authority to hear a case. In the first example, the plaintiff's request for $100,000 in damages meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for federal court. In the second example, the plaintiff's request for $4,000,000 in damages meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for class action lawsuits. In the third example, the plaintiff's request for $10,000 in damages exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims court, so the case must be filed in a higher court.

jurisdiction | jurisprudence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:21
@llama: aweee, thanks b (: tell that to britches! @mostlylegal tryna tell cobra to be a good goy and accept their labor lot! @britches nice projection, neck bones
11:22
balllls
11:24
@DigiFartHoe: Ok, u caught me red handed, Ill just come out and say it, I be crushin on u mad hard. I think I can fix u. Wat ur weekend look like bby?
11:27
Yeah that is why u stalked me on to counter strike too
11:31
that connections made no sense, digifart your insecurity screams louder than any rant you could type here lmao
11:33
lol no some fuck on counter strike the other day had the super duper rare name of llama (/s) but they was talking law shit and saying and speaking like this dweeb. Ofc i thought "could be lsd llama, probably not"
11:34
it was him actually
That was the llama of lsd fame
11:35
[deleted by starfishies]
11:36
If that scared u, just wait until what happens next week.
11:38
Thank god i aint gonna be dealin wit u fucking losers at law school lmfao
11:39
why do you still type here then?
11:39
Relaxxxxx Im jk, that was not me, but that is a crazy low probability occurrence. I would be spooked too! Im a nice guy irl, dont worry :/
11:40
geeked
11:42
@Mostlylegal: free country
11:43
ah i see, i thought it was because you are bored lonely and afraid of being with ur thoughts
KirklandEllis
11:45
its almost 9am at berkeley
@Mostlylegal: what’s the part of you that isn’t legal up to?
Mostlylegal
11:46
is the usual crowd shuffling in
Mostlylegal
11:46
ym, but mostly pickleball and prayer
11:47
When does the crowd studying for the lsat come in? A few months?
11:50
R&R likely lots of lurkers. Once ppl start planning on LSA for new applicants, bc they ask wat LSAT would it take to go to xzy school, bot links lsd, then they come here, but by default the chat is hidden so it may take months for ppl to realize the chat is active imo
11:50
[deleted by starfishies]
11:50
@DigiFartHoe: u got a friend in me, always
11:50
spread dem cheels
Mostlylegal
11:51
bro could never make it as a wise man, also uminn just sent me an email that they are so excited to see my app next cycle, so the next cycle users are def coming soon
11:51
ofda, friend got nuked. well, u had a friend in me!
starfishies
11:53
schools texting emailing and calling me about deposit deadlines got me feeling like I owe money
11:55
Hmmm okay
Mostlylegal
11:55
wish i was you my boy
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.