Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jurisdictional amount

Read a random definition: capax doli

A quick definition of jurisdictional amount:

Definition: Jurisdictional amount is the amount of money a person asks for in a lawsuit. It can also include the value of non-money things like an order to stop someone from doing something. If someone wants to sue in a court that handles cases between people from different states, they have to ask for more than $75,000. The court will usually believe them if they say they need that much money, unless the other side can prove they don't. Sometimes, people can add up different claims to reach the $75,000. Some states have their own rules about how much money someone can ask for in a lawsuit.

A more thorough explanation:

Jurisdictional amount refers to the amount of money a plaintiff requests in a lawsuit. It can also include the monetary value of non-monetary remedies, such as an injunction. The jurisdictional amount is important because it determines which court has the authority to hear the case.

For example, if a plaintiff wants to file a lawsuit in federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, they must request more than $75,000 in damages. If the plaintiff requests less than $75,000, the case must be filed in state court instead.

It's important to note that the jurisdictional amount is determined at the beginning of the trial. Even if a jury ultimately awards the plaintiff less than the requested amount, the court still has jurisdiction over the case.

Other situations where jurisdictional amount is relevant include class action lawsuits and state court systems with tiered jurisdictional requirements.

  • A plaintiff files a lawsuit in federal court, claiming $100,000 in damages. This meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for diversity jurisdiction.
  • A plaintiff files a class action lawsuit in federal court, claiming $4,000,000 in damages. This meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for class action lawsuits under the Class Action Fairness Act.
  • A plaintiff files a lawsuit in Massachusetts small claims court, claiming $10,000 in damages. This exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims court, so the case must be filed in a higher court.

These examples illustrate how the jurisdictional amount determines which court has the authority to hear a case. In the first example, the plaintiff's request for $100,000 in damages meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for federal court. In the second example, the plaintiff's request for $4,000,000 in damages meets the jurisdictional amount requirement for class action lawsuits. In the third example, the plaintiff's request for $10,000 in damages exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims court, so the case must be filed in a higher court.

jurisdiction | jurisprudence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
lilypadfrog
8:12
hi shawties
lilypadfrog
8:16
who’s getting into a law school today raise your hand
jackfrost11770
8:28
I sure hope so at this point
lilypadfrog
8:28
woooo
lilypadfrog
8:28
jackfrost for law school
jackfrost11770
8:29
LILYPADFROG FOR LAW SCHOOL
jackfrost11770
8:29
I really just love how now there's an executive order that says I don't exist as a person
jackfrost11770
8:29
Do I not have to pay taxes now? Loans? What now
lilypadfrog
8:34
you should probably assume this means your law school will be free
GreyCeaselessMammoth
8:34
i love that there's an executive order that we're all female now
jackfrost11770
8:38
I think so yeah. I think I don't have to pay for anything anymore
Trismegistus
8:40
can someone release today my god
lilypadfrog
8:41
i’m boutta release
sounding like that one guy in here who kept saying he was cumming
Dkk
8:43
Was that me cus I just released.
lilypadfrog
8:44
Wahoowa
Dkk
8:45
AI Overview +1 "Wahoowa" is a cheer and greeting used by fans of the University of Virginia (UVA).
Dkk
8:45
Learned something new today. I can sleep knowing I learned something today.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.