Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jus actus

Read a random definition: ad informandum judicem

A quick definition of jus actus:

Term: JUS ACTUS

Definition: Jus actus is a Latin term used in Roman law that refers to an act or action that has been done. It can also refer to a type of servitude in Roman law that allows for the driving of cattle or a carriage across another person's land. In modern times, it can also refer to an act of Parliament that has been passed by both houses but has not yet been approved by the monarch.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Jus actus is a Latin term used in Roman law that refers to an act or action that has been done. It can also refer to an act of Parliament that has been passed by both houses but not yet approved by the monarch. In Roman law, it can also refer to a servitude for driving cattle or a carriage across another's land.

  • When John signed the contract, it was considered a jus actus.
  • The bill was passed by both houses of Parliament, but it was not yet a jus actus until it was approved by the monarch.
  • In Roman law, a jus actus could be granted to allow someone to drive their cattle across another's land.

These examples illustrate how jus actus can refer to a variety of actions or legal situations, from signing a contract to passing a bill in Parliament to granting a servitude for driving cattle. In each case, jus actus refers to something that has been done or granted, but may not yet be fully approved or legally binding.

jus actionis | jus administrationes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 2 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.