Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

Read a random definition: praelibatio matrimonii

A quick definition of Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding :

Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding was a court case in 1953 where the Supreme Court decided that the Attorney General couldn't kick out a person who was living in the United States without giving them a chance to defend themselves. The person in the case was a resident alien who was excluded from the country without a hearing. The Supreme Court said that this was not fair and violated the person's rights. The Court said that even if someone is not a citizen, they still have rights and should be given a chance to speak up for themselves.

A more thorough explanation:

Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding is a legal case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1953. The case dealt with the rights of a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was facing deportation.

The Supreme Court held that the Attorney General did not have the authority to order the permanent exclusion and deportation of a lawful permanent resident of the United States without providing notice of the charges against him and the opportunity to be heard.

For example, if a person who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States is facing deportation, they must be given notice of the charges against them and the opportunity to be heard. They cannot be deported without a fair hearing.

In the case of Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, the petitioner was a permanent resident alien who was temporarily excluded on the basis of a regulation that gave the Attorney General authority to do so based on confidential information and without a hearing. The Attorney General later made the exclusion permanent, claiming that his entry was prejudicial to the public interest. The petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his detention violated due process of law granted by the Fifth Amendment.

This case illustrates the importance of due process of law and the right to be heard. Even if a person is not a citizen of the United States, they still have certain rights under the Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court held that a lawful permanent resident of the United States cannot be deported without a fair hearing. This ensures that the government cannot simply deport someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

Korematsu v. United States (1944) | L.W.O.P.

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.