Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

landed servitude

Read a random definition: OTP

A quick definition of landed servitude:

Landed servitude is when someone has the right to use a piece of land without owning it. This is called a servitude and it can include things like easements, licenses, and covenants. It can also be a burden on the land for someone else's benefit. In some cases, the servitude is natural, like the right to have support from the land next to yours. In other cases, it is acquired through an agreement or by law. It is important to understand the different types of servitudes and how they can affect land ownership.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Landed servitude is a type of servitude that is an encumbrance on a piece of land or other immovable property without the possession of it. It is a charge or burden on an estate for another's benefit. Examples of servitudes include easements, irrevocable licenses, profits, and real covenants.

Examples: An example of a landed servitude is the right of support for a building. This means that the owner of a building has the right to use the land of another property owner for the support of their building. Another example is a servitude of drip, which binds the servient estate's owner to maintain a roof so that rainwater does not drip or drain onto the dominant estate.

Explanation: Landed servitude is a legal concept that allows for the limited use of a piece of land or other immovable property without the possession of it. The examples illustrate how a servitude can benefit one property owner while burdening another. For example, the right of support for a building benefits the owner of the building, while the servitude of drip burdens the owner of the servient estate.

landed security | landefricus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.