Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

law of the case

Read a random definition: terminal disclaimer

A quick definition of law of the case:

The law of the case is a rule that says when an appeals court makes a decision about a legal issue in a case, that decision must be followed by the trial court and any future appeals courts in the same case with similar facts. This helps to avoid repeating legal arguments and saves time and resources. However, if new facts are presented in a later stage of the case, the court may apply the law to those new facts. This rule is similar to the ideas of res judicata and stare decisis.

A more thorough explanation:

The "law of the case doctrine" is a legal principle that states that the decision made by an appellate court on a legal issue is binding on both the trial court and the appellate court in any subsequent retrial or appeal involving the same case and substantially the same facts. This means that the appellate court's ruling on the questions presented to it becomes the "law of the case."

The purpose of this doctrine is to promote finality and judicial efficiency by minimizing unnecessary relitigation of legal issues that have already been resolved by the appellate court. If a court has already decided a legal issue in a case, the parties cannot bring up the same issue again in a later proceeding.

For example, if a defendant appeals a conviction and the appellate court rules that the evidence was obtained illegally, the trial court must exclude that evidence in any subsequent retrial. The appellate court's decision on the legality of the evidence becomes the "law of the case."

However, if new facts are presented in a subsequent proceeding that materially affect the legal issues at hand, the court may apply the law to the new facts as they are found.

It is important to note that the law of the case doctrine only applies to issues that were decided "directly or by implication" in a prior decision. It does not apply to issues that were not addressed in the prior decision.

Other related legal principles include res judicata and stare decisis.

law of admiralty | law of the land

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.