Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

learned-treatise rule

Read a random definition: jailhouse

A quick definition of learned-treatise rule:

The learned-treatise rule is a way to use a published text as evidence in court. This means that a book or article on a specific topic, like medicine or history, can be considered trustworthy and used to question an expert witness. The text can be accepted as evidence if an expert testifies that it is reliable or if the court decides it is authoritative. The text can be read aloud in court, but it cannot be shown as an exhibit. This rule is part of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

A more thorough explanation:

The learned-treatise rule is an exception to the hearsay rule in evidence. It allows a published text to be considered authoritative and admitted into evidence for the purpose of examining or cross-examining an expert witness. This can be established either by expert testimony or by judicial notice.

For example, if a doctor is testifying as an expert witness in a medical malpractice case, a medical journal article may be admitted into evidence to support their testimony. The article would be considered authoritative and reliable because it was published in a reputable medical journal.

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, a statement contained in a published treatise, periodical, or pamphlet on sciences or arts (such as history and medicine) can be admitted into evidence if it is established as authoritative. However, it cannot be received as an exhibit.

learned-intermediary doctrine | learning

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.