Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lee v. Weisman (1992)

Read a random definition: propter quod fecerunt per alium

A quick definition of Lee v. Weisman (1992):

Lee v. Weisman was a court case about prayer in public schools. The court decided that it was not okay for a public school to have a prayer during graduation because it goes against the rule that the government cannot promote any religion. The court said that the school was making students participate in the prayer, even if they didn't want to, and that was not fair. The court also said that even standing in silence during the prayer was enough to count as participating. So, the school had to stop having prayers during graduation.

A more thorough explanation:

Lee v. Weisman is a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1992. It was about prayer and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment is a part of the Constitution that protects people's freedom of religion. The case was about whether it was okay for a public school to include a prayer in its graduation ceremony.

The case started when the principal of a middle school in Providence, Rhode Island invited a Rabbi to give a prayer at the graduation ceremony. One of the parents, Daniel Weisman, didn't think it was right for a public school to have a religious prayer at a school event. He asked the court to stop the school from doing it.

The Supreme Court agreed with Weisman. They said that the school's prayer was unconstitutional because it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Establishment Clause says that the government can't make any laws that establish a religion or favor one religion over another.

The Court said that the school's prayer was a state-sponsored event because it was part of the graduation ceremony. They also said that the students were being forced to participate in the prayer because they had to attend the ceremony and stand in silence during the prayer. The Court said that this was not fair to students who didn't want to participate in the prayer.

For example, if a public school had a graduation ceremony and invited a priest to give a prayer, that would be unconstitutional because it would be favoring one religion over others. It would also be unfair to students who didn't want to participate in the prayer.

This case is important because it helps to protect people's freedom of religion. It also helps to make sure that public schools don't favor one religion over others.

leave year | legacy

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:17
@Law-Guy: you get it
16:19
@baddestbunny: oh yeah definitly. Idk how any system of government would work if you can't distribute social goods to everyone.
MildChiller
16:33
does anyone know if the Yale webinars are cameras on?
1a2b3c4d26z
16:35
Justice as deez!
17:49
Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
Just found out LSAC gpa is different from offical from undergrad, went from 3.0 on 4.0 scale to 2.67... Guess I'm a super splitter rather than a splitter
just submitted my first ever app! and now I am consumed by The Dread
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.