Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

legal jointure

Read a random definition: averaging down

A quick definition of legal jointure:

Legal Jointure: This is a legal term that refers to a type of property arrangement between a husband and wife. It is a way of ensuring that the wife will be provided for in the event of her husband's death. Essentially, the husband agrees to transfer certain property to his wife upon his death, which will then become her property. This is done through a legal agreement called a jointure. It is important to note that this type of arrangement is not commonly used today, as there are other ways to ensure that a spouse is provided for after death.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Legal jointure refers to a type of settlement made by a husband for his wife, in which she is entitled to receive a specific property or income after his death. This is a legal agreement that ensures the wife's financial security after her husband's death.

For example, if a husband owns a property, he can make a legal jointure agreement with his wife, stating that after his death, she will have the right to live in that property or receive income from it. This ensures that the wife is financially secure even after her husband's death.

Another example could be a husband who has a large sum of money in his bank account. He can make a legal jointure agreement with his wife, stating that after his death, she will receive a certain amount of money from his account every month. This ensures that the wife has a steady income even after her husband's death.

These examples illustrate how legal jointure works and how it can provide financial security for a wife after her husband's death.

legal jeopardy | legal liability

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.