Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

liberam legem amittere

Read a random definition: town hall

A quick definition of liberam legem amittere:

Term: Liberam Legem Amittere

Definition: Liberam Legem Amittere is a Latin term that means losing one's free law. This happens when a person commits a crime or becomes infamous. They lose their status of libera lex and are subjected to a "villenous judgment." This judgment includes being discredited as a juror and witness, forfeiting goods and chattels and lands for life, having their houses razed and trees uprooted, and going to prison. This punishment was given to conspirators and parties involved in a wager of battle who cried "craven." It is also known as amittere liberam legem or amittere legem terrae, which means losing the law of the land.

A more thorough explanation:

liberam legem amittere

When someone loses their free law, it is called "liberam legem amittere." This happens when someone commits a crime or does something shameful that makes them lose their status as a free person. In the past, this meant that the person would lose their property, their homes would be destroyed, and they would go to prison. This was a punishment for people who were involved in a conspiracy or who refused to fight in a battle.

One example of someone losing their free law is if they were involved in a conspiracy to overthrow the government. Another example is if someone refused to fight in a battle and cried "craven." In both cases, the person would be punished by losing their property and going to prison.

These examples illustrate how serious the punishment was for losing your free law. It was a way to keep people in line and prevent them from doing things that would harm society.

liberal interpretation | libera piscaria

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.