Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

material breach

Read a random definition: cassetur billa

A quick definition of material breach:

A material breach is when someone breaks a promise they made in a really big way. It's so bad that the person who was supposed to benefit from the promise can decide they don't want to keep going with the agreement. They can also sue the person who broke the promise for money to make up for what they lost. A material breach is different from a small breach, which might not be a big enough deal to cancel the whole agreement.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Material breach refers to a violation of a contractual obligation that is significant enough to allow the affected party to consider the breach as total, which means that the party is excused from further performance and can sue for damages.

For instance, if a company hires a contractor to build a house, and the contractor fails to complete the project on time or uses substandard materials, it would be considered a material breach of the contract. The company can then terminate the contract and sue the contractor for damages.

Other types of breaches include:

  • Anticipatory breach: A breach caused by a party's anticipatory repudiation, which means that the party indicates that they will not perform when performance is due.
  • Partial breach: A breach that is less significant than a material breach and gives the affected party the right to damages but does not excuse them from performance.
  • Passive breach of contract: A failure to perform the requirements of a contract.

It is important to note that every breach gives rise to a claim for damages, and the injured party may also have other remedies. However, if the breach is trifling, the court may choose to ignore it, and no claim arises.

material alteration | material change in circumstances

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.